A recent study published in Obesity has examined whether an English policy restricting new fast-food outlets helped lower childhood obesity rates. Researchers found that reducing new fast-food sellers in areas with existing high concentrations could positively impact children’s weight.
Rising Childhood Obesity in the UK
The United Kingdom has one of Europe’s highest rates of childhood obesity. Among children aged 10 to 11, obesity increased from just under 32% in 2006-07 to nearly 41% by 2020-21, with the COVID-19 pandemic likely accelerating this rise. Childhood obesity is associated with both immediate and long-term health consequences, from reduced life quality and mental health issues to increased risks of adult-onset conditions like diabetes and heart disease.
The National Health Service (NHS) faces significant costs related to obesity, estimated at £6.1 million in 2015 and projected to rise to £9.7 billion by 2050. Socioeconomic factors, fast-food availability, and environmental influences outside the home have all been linked to obesity, particularly in low-income areas where fast-food outlets are often more densely concentrated.
Since 2019, England’s fast-food outlet density has risen from 142 to 170 per 100,000 residents, with deprived areas seeing five times more outlets than wealthier neighborhoods. In response, about half of local governments have implemented guidelines to limit new fast-food businesses and encourage healthier food options. In Gateshead, one of the UK’s most deprived areas, policies targeting obesity aim to cut obesity rates among 10 and 11-year-olds from 23% to below 10% by 2025.
Study Overview
The researchers investigated whether limiting new fast-food outlets in Gateshead, where these policies were active since 2015, affected childhood obesity and related health inequalities. Data on children’s weight and fast-food availability were collected from national monitoring programs, with deprivation scores included to assess socioeconomic status.
The primary measure was the obesity and overweight prevalence among 10 and 11-year-olds, calculated alongside outlet density per 100,000 residents in each area. Gateshead’s results were then compared to nearby areas without similar restrictions, with statistical models controlling for deprivation scores.
Key Findings
Gateshead, which had a high prevalence of obesity and fast-food outlets, saw mixed results. Obesity rates for 10- and 11-year-olds decreased from 38% in 2011 to 35.5% in 2015, though they rose again to 37.7% by 2020. Overall, the planning restrictions did not have a statistically significant impact on reducing obesity across all areas, but they were notably effective in some of the most deprived parts of Gateshead. Here, obesity and overweight rates dropped in the second and third most deprived areas, which had the highest concentration of fast-food outlets before the policy.
Conclusion and Policy Implications
The study suggests that local planning policies may help reduce childhood obesity and overweight in specific areas by limiting fast-food outlet density, particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged regions. Gateshead saw a 10% drop in outlet density within four years of policy implementation, with notable health benefits in its more deprived areas.
These findings support policies targeting structural factors over individual behavioral change to combat childhood obesity. However, with the rise of online food delivery services, researchers recommend further studies to understand how access to unhealthy food through these platforms could affect policy outcomes and whether additional updates are needed to tackle evolving food environments effectively.
Related topics:
- Rapid City Area Schools Focus on Students’ Mental Health and Obtain $3.4 Million Grant
- Mammograms Now Screening for Heart Disease Risk
- One Death Linked to Multistate E. coli Outbreak from McDonald’s Quarter Pounders, CDC Reports
